|
|
|
Lecture 24: Crystal Field Theory
Read section 20.3 from your textbook.
crystal field model
- All interactions are electrostatic
- Ligands are negative point charges
- Electron repulsion between ligands and electron orbitals of metals
Let's think about repulsion between electrons in Cu+ and 2 ammonia ligands:

How does this relate to the molecular orbital diagram?

Follow the same process with Cu+ and 3 phosphine ligands:

Now look at the "d" orbitals or metal based orbitals in the molecular orbital diagram.

The d orbitals in a trigonal bipyramidal structure have this ordering due to electron-electron repulsion.

It's full molecular orbital diagram looks like this:

octahedral field
Let's move on to one of the most important geometries for transition metal complexes: octahedral. We say that a metal ion surrounded by 6 ligands is in an octahedral field. Imagine that the metal cation is a point charge and the ligands are anionic point charges.

The difference in energy of the d orbitals depends on the ligand. Strong field ligands cause a greater energy difference than weak field ligands.
I- < Br- < S-2 < SCN- < Cl- < N3-, F- < urea, OH- < ox, O-2 < H2O < NCS- < py, NH3 < en < bpy, phen < NO2- < CH3-, C6H5- < CN- < CO
The splitting of d orbitals is also a function of the metal. It is less in complexes of first row elements than in complexes of second and third row transition metals.
tetrahedral field
The splitting of d orbitals in a tetrahedral field is less than (4/9) the splitting with the same ligands in an octahedral field.
| |
|